As the wallcrawler makes his MCU debut in Captain America: Civil War, here’s a retrospective on the previous Spider-films. Look out, here comes the…
One of the first big comic book films of the 21st century, Spider-Man was a phenomenal hit at the time and still stands up today, even in our superhero-saturated world. Tobey Maguire makes for a very likeable lead as – you all know how it goes – geeky high school kid turned Spider-Man. He is likewise well supported by Kirsten Dunst, who does the most with her damsel-in-distress role, the brilliant J.K Simmons as Parker’s boss J. Jonah Jameson and Willem Dafoe, staying on the right side of ham as the Green Goblin. It’s skillfully-directed by Sam Raimi, packed with humour, emotion, action and grand, sweeping visuals of the urban vistas. This is how to do a superhero origin film.
Spider-Man 2 (2004)
The first Spider-Man film could have been hard to live up to but thankfully things only improved for Spider-Man 2, with many claiming it to be one of the best films in the superhero genre. The movie sees Peter struggling to balance his crimefighting with his everyday alter-ego, while still trying to gain the affection of Mary Jane. It is even tighter than the first film in delivering an engaging story with some great set pieces, plus Alfred Molina shines as the surprisingly tragic Doctor Octopus. Every Spider-film (and every superhero film, come to that) has had a lot to live up to ever since.
Spider-Man 3 (2007)
Poor, misunderstood Spider-Man 3. Few superhero films have been so highly-anticipated only to be met with a truly venomous reaction. This writer seems to be in the minority in finding this one an entertaining adventure. It certainly is not as well held together as the previous entries in the series, and there are more elements to the story than the movie can really manage, but it retains the core of the first two films while also suitably tying up the franchise’s ongoing character threads. It is definitely not as bad as is often thought – I’ll even defend the ‘dancing in the street’ scene as a deliberately cringe-inducing moment rather than a failure. There I said it.
The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)
With the first Spider-Man trilogy so recent in the memory, it is understandable that this reboot does not wholly step out of the original film’s shadow. While it tries hard to spin a different take on Spidey’s beginnings – e.g. the mystery of Peter’s parents – the story is essentially the same but without the directorial and storytelling flourish of before. However, the film is saved by the leads, Andrew Garfield (who is at his best when showcasing the adolescent awkward genius of Peter Parker) and Emma Stone as Gwen Stacey, whose chemistry surely outshines that of Maguire and Dunst. With a more confident film around them, they could be truly amazing. Let’s see if the sequel delivered…
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)
Short answer: it didn’t. Instead of focussing on telling its own story, TASM 2 is so excited to move forward with a shared universe it forgets to make sure we are as well. Jamie Foxx’s Electro is a poorly-drawn creation, while Dane DeHaan is wasted until terrible makeup as Spidey’s should-be nemesis the Green Goblin. Once again, the highlight is Garfield and Stone who ensure that the film’s tragic climax is actually as sad as it should be. So disappointing that it meant the character was rebooted just two years later, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 sadly stands as a warning to all wannabe franchises.
What are your thoughts on the Spider-Man films? Let us know in the comments!
6 thoughts on “Looking Back at the Spider-Man Films”
First one: Big let-down for me. I felt that the characters were flat, Spider-man looked too stocky for the role and the CGI didn’t really hold up even back then. And the end was overly melodramatic.
Second one: Quite an improvement. Even though it is pretty much a rehash of the first movie, it does have the train sequence (which is all kinds of awesome), there are at least some glimpses of character development and it looks like the franchise is finally able to move forward.
Third one: Or not. The same movie a third time was one time too much.
Fourth one: FINALLY the origin story I always wanted to see, with proper character development. Plus, Gwen Stacy. And some really thoughtful scenes. Plus Gwen Stacy. And a Spider-man which actually looks like Spider-man (though still a too old for the role). Plus Gwen Stacy.
Fifth one: Damnit Sony, you had a really great movie there and you ruined it by throwing all this sh… into it. Also, there was no reason to make it more like the Raimi movies, the best thing you ever did was moving away from that.
Thanks for commenting! Nice to hear that you like Amazing Spider-Man – Gwen Stacy was indeed awesome. Yeah, it was a shame about the fifth one.
Hope you enjoy Civil War!
Civil War was great! Not my fav, but GotG and The Winter Soldier have set the mark very high.
Can’t argue with that, those two are also fantastic!
Great blog, by the way. If you fancy guest writing for us at some point that would be awesome. 🙂
Thanks. I am honoured…but between my own blogs (two of which I try to update regularly) and the Agent of Shield coverage I do for Spoiler TV I am pretty much full.
That’s fine, I understand. Sounds like you’re pretty busy!